[107459] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rubens Kuhl Jr.)
Wed Sep 3 22:06:31 2008

Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 23:06:22 -0300
From: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rubensk@gmail.com>
To: "Jo Rhett" <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
In-Reply-To: <BEF5729B-EB86-4C74-B7C4-451914A71C46@netconsonance.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

> This statement is patently false.  The uRPF failures I dealt with were based
> entirely on the recommended settings, and were confirmed by Cisco.  Last I
> heard (2 months ago) the problems remain.  Cisco just isn't being honest
> with you about them.

Would you mind telling us what is the scenario so we can avoid it ?


Rubens


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post