[107456] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jim deleskie)
Wed Sep 3 20:44:00 2008
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 21:38:42 -0300
From: "jim deleskie" <deleskie@gmail.com>
To: "Jo Rhett" <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
In-Reply-To: <CEF85942-7BB0-401A-B88D-9813BAC15B08@netconsonance.com>
Cc: north American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This is an awesome thread... in the 18mts I tested F10 vs Juniper vs
Cisco I need see my Cisco sales rep push this hard :)
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com> wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>> Bottom line, in a few years, everyone carrying full tables with F10 gear
>> will probably need to
>> upgrade all of their line cards to quad-cam.
>
>
> Why is this statement being limited to F10?
>
> It appears to be true of every vendor.
>
> But why quad-cam? The dual-cam cards have indecent amounts of storage.
>
> --
> Jo Rhett
> Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and
> other randomness
>
>
>
>
