[106502] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [funsec] Subject line misleading. AT&T Pwned. Sweet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Brunner-Williams)
Thu Jul 31 10:31:29 2008
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:31:03 -0400
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
To: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2d106eb50807302112h69af707boe3f32c6b81e5a32c@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
oddly enough, i was chatting with a friend from the w3c while walking
off-site to lunch from the dublin ietf about the life, and death, of the
w3c's p3p project (i was a contributor, he works in a different area),
and its possible re-animation.
without meaning to (i assume) martin's made a landmark post -- one
mentioning "privacy policy", on nanog.
Martin Hannigan wrote:
> Not so quick. Privacy policy?
>
> -M<
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/30/08, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I guess history decided the previous discussion in favor of vix. Although
>>> I
>>> doubt vix sees this compromise at ATT as a victory, but rather a loss.
>>>
>>> Note: HD has not been compromised.
>>>
>> Well so if any of you uses an iphone to surf the net now's the time to
>> see if an iphone's nameservers can be changed to opendns :)
>>
>>
>>
>
>
