[106494] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: [funsec] Subject line misleading. AT&T Pwned. Sweet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tomas L. Byrnes)
Thu Jul 31 00:18:53 2008
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:18:43 -0700
In-Reply-To: <2d106eb50807302112h69af707boe3f32c6b81e5a32c@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb@byrneit.net>
To: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan@gmail.com>,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists@gmail.com>,
"Gadi Evron" <ge@linuxbox.org>, <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Between a potential problem with privacy, and an actual problem with
having my sessions redirected to the RBN, I'll take the privacy risk.
YMMV.
=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:hannigan@gmail.com]=20
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:13 PM
> To: Suresh Ramasubramanian; Gadi Evron; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: [funsec] Subject line misleading. AT&T Pwned.=20
> Sweet Irony:Metasploit Creator a Victim of His Own Creation (fwd)
>=20
> Not so quick. Privacy policy?
>=20
> -M<
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On 7/30/08, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> wrote:
> >> I guess history decided the previous discussion in favor of vix.=20
> >> Although I doubt vix sees this compromise at ATT as a victory, but=20
> >> rather a loss.
> >>
> >> Note: HD has not been compromised.
> >
> > Well so if any of you uses an iphone to surf the net now's=20
> the time to=20
> > see if an iphone's nameservers can be changed to opendns :)
> >
> >
>=20
> --
> Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
>=20
>=20
