[103130] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Transition Planning for IPv6 as mandated by the US Govt
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry J. Blunk)
Tue Mar 18 14:28:16 2008
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:21:37 -0400
From: "Larry J. Blunk" <ljb@merit.edu>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
CC: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>, Andy Dills <andy@xecu.net>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <47DF3163.8060708@psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Randy Bush wrote:
>> I believe whoever shows off a functional NAT-PT device at the next NANOG
>> might get some praise. I heard it was a bit of a disaster.
>>
>
> by the time the show got to apnic/apricot the week after nanog, we had
> the cisco implementation of nat-pt and totd working and it worked well.
>
> randy
>
And the NAT-PT implementation at NANOG (naptd) did seem
to work once some configuration issues were ironed out. Unfortunately,
this was not resolved until the very end of the meeting.
