[103147] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Transition Planning for IPv6 as mandated by the US Govt
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Tue Mar 18 20:41:18 2008
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:40:24 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Larry J. Blunk" <ljb@merit.edu>
CC: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>, Andy Dills <andy@xecu.net>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <47DFE305.2040204@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> Still trying to understand deployment scenarios for nat-pt.
enterprise
> native-v6 + v4-nat (as outlined in Michael Sinatra's lightning talk)
i am not unhappy with ms's preso except that enterprise keeps whining
about 1918 conflicts
> and Alain Durand's v4v6v4 seem more likely deployment candidates
useful for big (broadband) provider where edge is consumer
randy
