[102493] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What is being 'ON NET' good for these days?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Mon Feb 18 08:55:00 2008
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:50:26 -0500
From: "William Herrin" <herrin-nanog@dirtside.com>
To: "Drew Weaver" <drew.weaver@thenap.com>
Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <B7152C470C9BF3448ED33F16A75D81C14D2844B4B4@exchanga.thenap.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Feb 18, 2008 8:00 AM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com> wrote:
> We are currently ON NET with 3 major international telecommunication companies
Drew,
"On Net" is like "Tier 1." It has devolved into marketspeak that
doesn't mean very much. In your case it seems to mean that you can
connect with that particular carrier without first purchasing an ILEC
local loop. This is mildly helpful, but only mildly.
What it sounds like you're looking for is a "carrier neutral" data
center where you can connect with multiple providers and peers. The
Equinixes and Switch and Datas of the world fill this niche.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
