[102154] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: potential hazards of Protect-America act
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bulk)
Tue Jan 29 21:29:05 2008
Reply-To: <frnkblk@iname.com>
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: <michael.dillon@bt.com>, <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:28:05 -0600
In-Reply-To: <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B001DA869C@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Pretty good in the generalities, but there are few finer technical points
that could be been precisely and accurately stated. One that comes to mind
was the MD5 reference, another was the "50% loss" when talking about
performing an optical split.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
michael.dillon@bt.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:47 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: potential hazards of Protect-America act
I wonder if this is on topic?
<http://www.crypto.com/papers/paa-ieee.pdf>
Among other things, it discusses technical hazards of the act.
--Michael Dillon
