[102152] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: potential hazards of Protect-America act
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James R. Cutler)
Tue Jan 29 18:41:13 2008
In-Reply-To: <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B001DA869C@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
From: "James R. Cutler" <james.cutler@consultant.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:38:44 -0500
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Well, it could affect the equipment required, floor space, real
estate cost, log retention, bandwidth requirements, equipment
addressing, procedures, training, trouble desk, employee count and,
probably, more. So, I would think it would affect network
operations. I would suggest that it is on topic. There are business
and legal hazards along with the technical hazards. Compliance with
differing data privacy and retention laws are not the least of these.
On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:46 PM, <michael.dillon@bt.com>
<michael.dillon@bt.com> wrote:
>
>
> I wonder if this is on topic?
>
> <http://www.crypto.com/papers/paa-ieee.pdf>
>
> Among other things, it discusses technical hazards of the act.
>
>
> --Michael Dillon
James R. Cutler
james.cutler@consultant.com
