[100651] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: mail operators list
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Tue Oct 30 22:42:12 2007
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:11:18 +0530
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Al Iverson" <aiversonlists@spamresource.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <7d6a0cac0710301032m679d1c76k7afb2c546510bc24@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Well, the current nanog MLC is mostly because Susan Harris was
cracking down equally on discussions of anything mail / spam filtering
related (operational not kooky) .. in fact, on anything that didnt
involve pushing packets from A to B.
And we have Marty Hannigan from the MLC telling us that operational
mail / spam filtering issues are perfectly on topic. New list not
particularly necessary I think .. but sure, a spam or mailops bof at
nanog would be a good idea. I (or well, APCAUCE) have been running a
spam conference track at APRICOT for the past few years now ..
srs
On Oct 30, 2007 11:02 PM, Al Iverson <aiversonlists@spamresource.com> wrote:
> > I would support the creation of a mail-operators list (& agenda time
> > for a mailops bof, since a lot of networks are small enough to mean
> > that netops and sysops are often the same guys) if it's deemed to be
> > offtopic on nanog-l.
>
> I have a sinking fear it'll be overrun with loud people who aren't
> actually responsible for anything more than a single IP at most, like
> SPAM-L, but I suppose it's worth a shot.
