[100660] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: mail operators list
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Thu Nov 1 01:31:41 2007
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:16:09 -0400
From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists@gmail.com>,
"Al Iverson" <aiversonlists@spamresource.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0710310008250.32471-100000@bawx.pilosoft.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 10/31/07, Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
[ snip ]
>
> MLC's position is that anything that is acceptable for the conference is
> acceptable on the list. Mail operations are on-topic, although
> tangentially. Spam filtering is definitely off-topic.
Perhaps personal filtering is not, but spam appliances or home grown
filtering, methods, code, or techniques for the purpose of despamming
customer in/out mail is mail operations are, for all intents and
purposes, on topic. I've demonstrated this myself in a few topics
related to spam ddos and surrounding tools and techniques.
The only thing I'd ask is that people don't branch off threads. It
messes up our killfiles. :-)
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
