[100098] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 240/4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Oct 16 17:38:52 2007
To: David Ulevitch <davidu@everydns.net>
Cc: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:20:54 PDT."
<47152B36.6040907@everydns.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:33:40 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1192570420_16458P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:20:54 PDT, David Ulevitch said:
> The effort someone would spend figuring out if 204/4 is reachable and
> not-pain-inducing in their infrastructure is better spent figuring out
> how to make IPv6 work within their sphere of responsibilities.
After the pain felt by 69/8, 70/8, 71/8, and others, you'd think it would
almost be enough to make a provider say "screw it" and go IPv6-only. :)
--==_Exmh_1192570420_16458P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFHFS40cC3lWbTT17ARAl/5AKDsG0IJ/xvSjUsiWcAdkrBq0ABEOACg8dj8
SLnnj/nk9MIKSz1VKYfZNuU=
=C25g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1192570420_16458P--
