[100097] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 240/4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Florian Weimer)
Tue Oct 16 17:28:21 2007
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>,
Vince Fuller <vaf@cisco.com>,
North American Network Operators Group <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:27:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710162114210.5216@netcore.fi> (Pekka Savola's
message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:29:51 +0300 (EEST)")
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
* Pekka Savola:
> Do we need to classify anything (yet)?
>
> I say the proof is in the pudding. Once some major user decides
> they'll need 240/4 for something, they'll end up knocking their
> vendors' (probably dozens) and their own ops folks' doors.
If there's risk that we'll see end user assignments from 240/4 at any
time in the future, this certainly reduces the set of possible
experiments even further. So I think it makes sense to designate part
of it as "private use, not subject to allocation" if anybody sees any
benefit from encouraging experimentation.
