[65] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: LIVING WAGE SIT-IN AT HARVARD (fwd)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Wally)
Fri Apr 20 00:19:41 2001
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:21:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Wally <wally@sub-zero.mit.edu>
To: "Sourav K. Mandal" <Sourav.Mandal@ikaran.com>
cc: mit-talk@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200104200403.AAA14931@dichotomy.dyn.dhs.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0104200018170.22210-100000@sub-zero.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> > Where you're argument fails is your moral absolutism.
> > Objectivists are the most incapable capitalists because
> > of their inability to break their principles in favor
> > of coddling bleeding hearts. If you can get away with
> > stealing the difference, go ahead.
>
> I'm sorry you think that way. Does it bother you being a whore,
> taking blindly, without a second thought to your pride? If you had
> any, you'd realize that the moral _is_ the practical.
Irrelevant to MIT-TALK@MIT.EDU.
While this discussion is by turns amusing and depressing, it's *way* off
topic. Please, can you guys use objectivists@mit.edu or somesuch list?
Hearing people equate socialism and fascism is just too stupid for me to
put up with tonight.
W.
