[2714] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: [Mit-talk] Upcoming UA Issue - Student Group Property Ownership
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Riggle)
Thu Oct 19 16:55:52 2006
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:55:36 -0400
From: "Kevin Riggle" <kevinr@mit.edu>
To: "Steven M Kelch" <kelch@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62L.0610191629200.11985@ptolomaea.mit.edu>
Cc: mit-talk@mit.edu
Errors-To: mit-talk-bounces@mit.edu
On 10/19/06, Steven M Kelch <kelch@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> The ASA President is also VP of the Toons, and so a non-ASA arbiter was
> determined to be more legitimate, which is one reason that this issue was
> not given to the ASA to handle.
>
Why didn't the ASA President just recuse herself? My understanding is
that handling these kinds of disputes is one of the fundamental
purposes of the ASA.
- Kevin
>
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Kevin Riggle wrote:
>
> > On 10/18/06, Steven M Kelch <kelch@mit.edu> wrote:
> >> It evolves because people are mixing two different issues here:
> >>
> >> First; an arbiter will be set up to renegotiate use of the Log's studio.
> >> It's possible nothing will change, but it's something that the Senate felt
> >> was worth investigating. This came from a request by Finboard *NOT*
> >> student groups.
> >>
> > Why was the request for arbitration handled by the UA via Finboard,
> > and not by the ASA? My understanding was that the Toons were going to
> > seek ASA arbitration for their particular grievances, but I didn't
> > hear the outcome of that. Did Finboard raise the issue separately?
> >
> > - Kevin
> > --
> > Kevin Riggle (kevinr@mit.edu)
> >
>
>
--
Kevin Riggle (kevinr@mit.edu)
_______________________________________________
MIT-talk mailing list
MIT-talk@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mit-talk
