[2712] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: [Mit-talk] Upcoming UA Issue - Student Group Property Ownership
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Riggle)
Thu Oct 19 16:28:47 2006
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:27:55 -0400
From: "Kevin Riggle" <kevinr@mit.edu>
To: "Steven M Kelch" <kelch@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62L.0610180458070.11985@ptolomaea.mit.edu>
Cc: mit-talk@mit.edu
Errors-To: mit-talk-bounces@mit.edu
On 10/18/06, Steven M Kelch <kelch@mit.edu> wrote:
> It evolves because people are mixing two different issues here:
>
> First; an arbiter will be set up to renegotiate use of the Log's studio.
> It's possible nothing will change, but it's something that the Senate felt
> was worth investigating. This came from a request by Finboard *NOT*
> student groups.
>
Why was the request for arbitration handled by the UA via Finboard,
and not by the ASA? My understanding was that the Toons were going to
seek ASA arbitration for their particular grievances, but I didn't
hear the outcome of that. Did Finboard raise the issue separately?
- Kevin
--
Kevin Riggle (kevinr@mit.edu)
_______________________________________________
MIT-talk mailing list
MIT-talk@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mit-talk
