[1175] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: A little rational thought---Objective and real power

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stanislav Funiak)
Thu Mar 14 11:01:46 2002

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID:  <3C908939.E3F4FD33@mit.edu>
Date:         Thu, 14 Mar 2002 06:27:53 -0500
From:         Stanislav Funiak <stanf@MIT.EDU>
To:           MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU

This is just plain wrong.  As pointed out before, Article III Section 4
does not apply: Rhett did _not_ go around, giving out $10 bills in his
campaign.  Those $5000 do _not_ constitute his campaign material.
Instead, he made promises of what he would do if he gets elected, _one_
of which was giving people $10 from a general fund (most of which would
probably be donated to charity anyway).  Such things are done in
elections all the time: president promises tax cuts, Yoon&Vigil promise
to increase funding for social events (as if I cared), etc.

Giving $10 to people and letting them decide if they want to donate it
to charity is hell a lot better than paying for yet another
let's-get-some-free-food study break.

Stano

> Article III ----- Section 4
>
> B. The Commission shall limit the value of campaign materials to
> between 1% and 2%
>                        of the annual regular undergraduate tuition
> level.
>
> 2% of our tuition is a great deal less than 5000 dollars.  It is vital
> that all people understand that $10 bills are campaign materials just
> like candy or signs, or chalk or posters.  We all agree which is more
> effective at motivating people.  It is therefore clear that overuse of
> such a powerful motivator is a violation of campaign rules as they
> stand.
>
>
> Through all of these things,  The Rules Board can make whatever
> legislation that it deems appropriate.  IT, like the supreme court
> does not have to answer to the people who elected the UA president and
> Vice-president.  This is exactly how democracy works in fact.  Better
> even,  than our terribly flawed US elections process that allows  only
> the rich men of our country to be elected. (campaign finance reform)
>
> Seek Truth not Slander,
>
> David B. Smith '05
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation on the use of the mailing lists mit-talk, all-talk,
mit-news, housing-talk, and the mit-talk Zephyr class is available at:
http://web.mit.edu/institvte/talk/

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post