[1148] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: your mail
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Victor W Brar)
Thu Mar 14 01:23:15 2002
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.30L.0203132346180.12718-100000@nerd-xing.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 23:59:48 -0500
From: Victor W Brar <vbrar@MIT.EDU>
To: MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <200203140436.XAA22604@quickstation-3.mit.edu>
Obviously, we appeal as is our privilege in Article 3 Section D, and of
course votes cannot be discarded until the appeal has been heard.
Also you never informed us that such a decision was being made tonight as
was our privilege in Article 3 section A.
Among other things, we think that it is unfair and unethical to
retroactively apply rules to people. The statement of candidacy uses the
phrase "I _____ hereby ....." not "I _____ have ...."
Please let us know when our appeal will be heard.
Victor
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Daniel D Liston wrote:
>
> Our decision,
> Due to campaigning against the spirit of the campaign, the election commission
> and the UA would immediatley revoke Creighton and Brar's position, if they win a position.
> Therefore all Creighton and Brar votes are now void and those who voted for them will
have their next votes counted. It is the election commission's duty to elect officers of
high standards. Creighton and Brar do not live up to these standards as shown by their
unfair campaign tactics.
> >Dan Liston
> >Rules Board Chair
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation on the use of the mailing lists mit-talk, all-talk,
mit-news, housing-talk, and the mit-talk Zephyr class is available at:
http://web.mit.edu/institvte/talk/
