[9977] in SIPB bug reports
Re: pine-sipb wrapper
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Tue Jan 20 15:57:50 2004
From ghudson@MIT.EDU Tue Jan 20 20:57:50 2004
Return-Path: <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
Delivered-To: bug-sipb-mtg@CHARON.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 27085 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 20:57:50 -0000
Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (18.7.7.80)
by charon.mit.edu with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 20:57:50 -0000
Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.86])
by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id i0KKvOPM029377;
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:57:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from equal-rites.mit.edu (EQUAL-RITES.MIT.EDU [18.18.1.59])
(authenticated bits=56)
(User authenticated as ghudson@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i0KKvNRw016129;
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:57:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from ghudson@localhost) by equal-rites.mit.edu (8.12.9)
id i0KKvNWk003390; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:57:23 -0500
Subject: Re: pine-sipb wrapper
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
To: Jacob Morzinski <jmorzins@mit.edu>
Cc: bug-sipb@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <400D954E.1070302@mit.edu>
References: <400C72A0.7090105@mit.edu>
<1074603363.16682.75.camel@error-messages.mit.edu> <400D38A1.10605@mit.edu>
<1074608738.467.2.camel@equal-rites.mit.edu> <400D954E.1070302@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1074632243.467.25.camel@equal-rites.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:57:23 -0500
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 15:53, Jacob Morzinski wrote:
> Apparently there are a fair number of people who have been habitually
> answering "2" to the athena-wrapper question (let me use sipb pine for
> now, ask me again later) -- I've seen two people like this in the sipb
> office in the past three days. Maybe the jar to their habits will
> encourage them to pick one.
One option I thought of is to check if "which pine" yields
/usr/athena/bin/pine. (Solaris /bin/sh appears to have which.) If this
is true, then either the user ran the Athena pine wrapper and picked
option 2, or they ran SIPB pine by explicit path.
