[9833] in SIPB bug reports
Re: exmh?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adlar Kim)
Thu Jan 8 22:40:11 2004
To: bug-sipb@mit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:08:23 EST."
<3FFE0D17.7070506@mit.edu>
From: Adlar Kim <jwkim@ai.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:38:16 -0500
I am not sure, but it may be worth upgrading since this version is more than 4
years old. I'm hoping the newer version to handle the html emails better than
the current version. Also, when I hit reply to messages with attachments, the
attachment gets corrupted because of the ">" signs.. hope the new one doesn't
do that..
-- Adlar
>> Jacob Morzinski wrote:
> Adlar Kim wrote:
> > I'm currently using exmh version 2.1.1 in sipb locker. Is this ever going
to
> > be upgraded to a newer version?
>
> Hello,
>
> The short answer is that I'm not inclined to upgrade it, but if you
> argue persuasively, you could change my mind. Does a modern version of
> exmh have a feature you want to use?
>
> The last time I looked at exmh was around version number 2.4, and I was
> not impressed with it or with email messages on the developer mailing
> list describing features and bugs present in exmh 2.5. The major
> improvement was syntax highlightning, and I judged that the cost of the
> bugs was not worth the minor gain of highlightning.
>
> I see from the project web pages that v2.5 never made it to a public
> release, and that the most recent exmh has been out and stable for a
> year now at version 2.6.3. Maybe it wouldn't hurt too badly to upgrade.
>
> -Jacob Morzinski
> MIT SIPB
>
> (Replies have been redirected to the support mailing list of the sipb
> locker, "bug-sipb@mit.edu".)
>
