[5160] in SIPB bug reports
Re: reorg of the SIPB locker
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (yandros@MIT.EDU)
Tue Feb 14 00:36:10 1995
From: yandros@MIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1995 05:35:52 GMT
To: marc@cam.ov.com
Cc: ghudson@MIT.EDU, jhawk@MIT.EDU, bug-sipb@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <9502131856.AA06061@dun-dun-noodles.cam.ov.com> (message from Marc Horowitz on Mon, 13 Feb 1995 13:56:43 -0500)
/mit/sipb/arch/pmax_ul4/bin Decstation binaries
/mit/sipb/share/exec Architecture-independent
executables
Something about the wild difference in naming here just bothers me a
lot. I'm afraid it will be confusing to users and maintainers.
This is one of the reasons I like `share/bin' slightly more than
`share/exec'. Any other opinions?
chad
