[3471] in BarnOwl Developers
Re: [barnowl] Update and make configurable the default format (#136)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Dehnert)
Sun Jun 9 15:50:20 2013
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:50:17 -0700
From: Alex Dehnert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: barnowl/barnowl <reply+i-15055026-2049c87dc71753ba41b2922153aac251ad51a146-4475081@reply.github.com>
To: barnowl/barnowl <barnowl@noreply.github.com>
In-Reply-To: <barnowl/barnowl/pull/136@github.com>
----==_mimepart_51b4dc7995fe1_6461cdbdd8823e6
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:50:17 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-ID: <51b4dc7999674_6461cdbdd8824ea@worker4.rs.github.com.mail>
I thought about --enable-* vs. --with-*, and decided on --with. I don't recall why exactly.
It could have been because of:
```
-> barnowl / df.d / AUTH: adehnert 2013-05-29 00:32:40 (Alex Dehnert) / NOVGOROD.MIT.EDU
Hrmph, is --with-default-format the "right" thing? Isn't that
supposed to be a package name?
barnowl / df.d / AUTH: jhutz@CS.CMU.EDU 2013-05-29 00:33:12 (JHutz) / sirius.fac.cs.cmu.edu
Yes, but no. Just go with it.
```
Alternatively, I might have felt bad about using an argument to pick the default format, given "--enable-feature options should never make a feature behave differently or cause one feature to replace another.".
> (Speaking of which, why do we have --with-stack-protector there?))
No idea.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/barnowl/barnowl/pull/136#issuecomment-19172259
----==_mimepart_51b4dc7995fe1_6461cdbdd8823e6
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:50:17 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-ID: <51b4dc799ab7c_6461cdbdd882563@worker4.rs.github.com.mail>
<p>I thought about --enable-* vs. --with-*, and decided on --with. I don't recall why exactly.</p>
<p>It could have been because of:</p>
<pre><code>-> barnowl / df.d / AUTH: adehnert 2013-05-29 00:32:40 (Alex Dehnert) / NOVGOROD.MIT.EDU
Hrmph, is --with-default-format the "right" thing? Isn't that
supposed to be a package name?
barnowl / df.d / AUTH: jhutz@CS.CMU.EDU 2013-05-29 00:33:12 (JHutz) / sirius.fac.cs.cmu.edu
Yes, but no. Just go with it.
</code></pre>
<p>Alternatively, I might have felt bad about using an argument to pick the default format, given "--enable-feature options should never make a feature behave differently or cause one feature to replace another.".</p>
<blockquote>
<p>(Speaking of which, why do we have --with-stack-protector there?))</p>
</blockquote>
<p>No idea.</p>
<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br>Reply to this email directly or <a href='https://github.com/barnowl/barnowl/pull/136#issuecomment-19172259'>view it on GitHub</a>.<img src='https://github.com/notifications/beacon/JJk3yKd0u6qAmPAmJXdf99lbpeDhTmH4RRsFgUZVxsWHjq7cATHmpnpxZ6OYAZvE.gif' height='1' width='1'></p>
----==_mimepart_51b4dc7995fe1_6461cdbdd8823e6--
