[24430] in APO-L
Re: [APO-L] Proposed: Older Undergrads as advisors?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christine L Rossman)
Wed Sep 8 09:15:19 2004
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:14:15 -0400
Reply-To: Christine L Rossman <corporateslave@optonline.net>
From: Christine L Rossman <corporateslave@optonline.net>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
In-Reply-To: <004001c49559$8b1b59f0$9520b341@athlonpc>
scelliot wrote:
>>The proposed amendment would change the last sentence of Article III,
>>Section 2, (4) Advisory membership from
>>"Such Membership may not be conferred upon undergraduate students." to
>>"Such Membership may not be conferred upon undergraduate students
>>younger than age 23."
>
> But for me the overriding thought is that an undergrad who desires to be
> involved but not as a pledge or active brother is not likely to fulfill the
> duties required of an advisor, either.
>
Why couldn't they fulfill the duties required of an advisor? I fulfill
my duties as an advisor and I live almost 2 hours away from the chapter
I advise. It's not as involved as it is for a pledge or active brother.
I agree with the proposal, I know someone in my section who is returning
to school and would feel out of place as an active brother now.
In LF&S,
Christine Rossman
Alum/Advisor Alpha Delta Eta (SUNY Albany)
Section 88 Staff - Marist College Sponsor
Life Member
