[6780] in APO Printshop

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Benazeer as journeyman?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leonard H Tower Jr.)
Fri Apr 11 15:31:21 2014

Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 15:31:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Leonard H Tower Jr." <tower@alum.mit.edu>
To: Ellen Kranzer <ccrazy@mit.edu>
cc: apo-printshop-journeyman@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404082131380.31419@PSI-PHI.MIT.EDU>

Requiring a successful observed/supervised qualifing run before they
can go solo is a much better way of expressing what I tried to say.

Also that new journeymen shouldn't qualify press-ops they have
trained.

Can you communicate that to Benazeer with our congratulations?

And announce her becoming a journeyman?  Maybe to apo-news as well?

Thanx.

yiLFS -len 

   Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 21:39:31 -0400 (EDT)
   From: Ellen Kranzer <ccrazy@MIT.EDU>
   To: Leonard H Tower Jr. <tower@alum.mit.edu>
   Cc: apo-printshop-journeyman@mit.edu
   Subject: Re: Benazeer as journeyman?
   
   
   
   If you want to say that after the first few training runs, it is mandatory
   that someone else do the qualifying run that makes sense.
   
   Requiring a new journeyman's qualifying runs to be observed, the same way
   training runs are, makes sense.
   
   I don't see how not allowing someone to supervise a qualifying run tells you
   anything about the holes in the training runs runs they did. It just
   continues to restrict the number of people available to do qualifying.
   
   - Ellen
   
   
   
   
   
   
   On Thu, 27 Mar 2014, Leonard H Tower Jr. wrote:
   
   > Someone else proposed this restriction for Alex's try at becoming a
   > journeyman.
   > 
   > It seems wise now, with a fair number of new journeymen coming online,
   > where any holes in their training runs would be caught by more
   > experienced journeymen.
   > 
   > Anyone else has input?
   > 
   > yiLFS -len
   > 
   >   Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 01:41:46 -0400 (EDT)
   >   From: Ellen Kranzer <ccrazy@MIT.EDU>
   >   To: Leonard H Tower Jr. <tower@alum.mit.edu>
   >   Cc: apo-printshop-journeyman@mit.edu
   >   Subject: Re: Benazeer as journeyman?
   > 
   > 
   >   Why the restriction? My recollection is that most people moving to
   > journeyman
   >   have done a supervised training run and if that is satisfactory, the
   > person
   >   becomes a full journeyman and can do both training and qualifying runs.
   > 
   >   YiS
   >   Ellen
   > 
   >   On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Leonard H Tower Jr. wrote:
   > 
   >   >   Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:58:25 -0400 (EDT)
   >   >   From: Ellen Kranzer <ccrazy@MIT.EDU>
   >   >
   >   >   Benazeer is interested in becoming a journeyman. How do people feel
   >   >   about that? I'm comfortable with it after watching her recent work
   >   >   in the shop.
   >   >
   >   >   YiS
   >   >   Ellen
   >   >
   >   > As long as she's restricted to training runs for a while, I quite
   >   > comfortable with this.
   >   >
   >   > I suggest when she or someone brings it up, we review her doing
   >   > qualifying runs.
   >   >
   >   > yiLFS -len
   >   >
   > 
   > 
   

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post