[5697] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: CRLF vs LF was: Re: holding connections open...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathaniel Borenstein)
Mon Sep 19 08:44:44 1994
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 1994 13:59:01 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: nsb@nsb.fv.com
From: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Excerpts from www-talk: 19-Sep-94 Re: CRLF vs LF was: Re: hol..
hallam@dxal18.cern.ch (1044)
> I hope nobody interpreted what I said as implying that people should not send
> a CRLF, the point is really that peoples servers should not go falling over
> they only get an LF.
Right, that's precisely the right principle -- be conservative in what
you send & liberal in what you accept. -- NB
