[5681] in www-talk@info.cern.ch

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

CRLF vs LF was: Re: holding connections open...

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Auerbach)
Sun Sep 18 12:58:27 1994

Date: Sun, 18 Sep 1994 18:50:51 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: karl@cavebear.com
From: Karl Auerbach <karl@cavebear.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>


 >   |>1. Use multipart/* and BASE64 encoding.
.
 >   It would also make Tim B-L very very unhappi. The whole point of HTTP is
 >   to exploit being 8 bit clean. We do not want the smallest toehold for the
 >   people who would start running 7 bit only transports.


Am I imagining things are do we have some inconsistency about how
servers terminate their header lines?  Out of the side of my eye last
week I think I perceived two major servers (NCSA and CERN) having
different opinions whether to terminate a header line with a simple LF
or a CRLF pair.

		--karl--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post