[5685] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: CRLF vs LF was: Re: holding connections open...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (hallam@dxal18.cern.ch)
Sun Sep 18 15:04:05 1994
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 1994 20:56:26 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: hallam@dxal18.cern.ch
From: hallam@dxal18.cern.ch
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
>Am I imagining things are do we have some inconsistency about how
>servers terminate their header lines? Out of the side of my eye last
>week I think I perceived two major servers (NCSA and CERN) having
>different opinions whether to terminate a header line with a simple LF
>or a CRLF pair.
Both are permitted under RFC822 rules. Basically you can't guarantee
that a telnet port will send CRLF or that it will only send LF so both have
to be OK.
Phill H-B
