[1226] in NetBSD-Development

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: List of problems

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Sat Feb 3 04:49:52 1996

To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Yoav Yerushalmi <yoav@MIT.EDU>, netbsd-dev@MIT.EDU
From: hartmans@MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Date: 03 Feb 1996 04:49:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: Greg Hudson's message of Sat, 03 Feb 1996 03:07:41 EST

>>>>> "Greg" == Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

    >> We can either upgrade to 5.001e, or go back to 5.000, but we
    >> can't leave it in this state. (also, sys/file.ph is in one way
    >> or another broken.. but that's minor).

    Greg> sys/file.ph is the same under 5.000 and 5.001e, and there's
    Greg> been no change to h2ph to make it different; apparently the
    Greg> warnings you get trying to evaluate it come from a change in
    Greg> the perl parser.

	The problem Yoav is seeing is minor; eval under Perl 5.001
often just dumps core.  

	One question: why are we upgrading to 5.001E instead of
5.001M?

--Sam



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post