[11748] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Hardy)
Thu Nov 9 21:43:51 2000
Message-Id: <005001c04abe$a9dbf460$fe482bcb@lagado.com>
From: "John Hardy" <jh@lagado.com>
To: "Arjun Ray" <aray@q2.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <www-talk@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:33:26 +1100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arjun Ray" <aray@q2.net>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>; <www-talk@w3.org>
Sent: 10 November 2000 13:31
Subject: Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
: On 9 Nov 2000 ssarkar@ayushnet.com wrote:
: > On Thu, 09 November 2000, "Nic Ferrier" wrote:
:
: >> There is a natural language that is computer parsable... I can't
: >> remember what it's called though.
:
: > Sanskrit is the language from ancient India. It is the language
: > of Aryans
:
: Not really. That would be the dialects that make up "Vedic", of which
: Sanskrit is a derivative. In fact, Sanskrit is not really a natural
: language (as Vedic was), but a constructed one.
: [Wildly off-topic, I know. Sorry.]
Anyone got a DTD for Proto-Indo European?
;-j
