[11755] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ilya A. Volynets)
Sat Nov 11 04:50:44 2000
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 22:30:38 -0500 (EST)
Old-X-Envelope-From: www-talk-request@tux.w3.org Thu Nov 9 22:30:23 2000
From: "Ilya A. Volynets" <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-talk@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <005001c04abe$a9dbf460$fe482bcb@lagado.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011091910450.23283-100000@alpha.total-knowledge.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Old-X-Envelope-To: www-talk
Resent-From: gerald@w3.org
Resent-To: www-talk@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> From: "Arjun Ray" <aray@q2.net>
> To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>; <www-talk@w3.org>
> Sent: 10 November 2000 13:31
> Subject: Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
>
>
> : On 9 Nov 2000 ssarkar@ayushnet.com wrote:
> : > On Thu, 09 November 2000, "Nic Ferrier" wrote:
> :
> : >> There is a natural language that is computer parsable... I can't
> : >> remember what it's called though.
> :
> : > Sanskrit is the language from ancient India. It is the language
> : > of Aryans
> :
> : Not really. That would be the dialects that make up "Vedic", of which
> : Sanskrit is a derivative. In fact, Sanskrit is not really a natural
> : language (as Vedic was), but a constructed one.
>
> : [Wildly off-topic, I know. Sorry.]
>
> Anyone got a DTD for Proto-Indo European?
>
> ;-j
>
As russian saing goes: "Every joke has seed of joke in it".
DTD (or better said LTD -- Language Type Definition) for a human
language might be not a bad idea at all. Also Esperanto might be of
interest as well defined and structured language (though this is a guess
- -- I know nothing about it).
Ilya.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAjoLa8gACgkQtKh84cA8u2lsSACgtA40Iq0Zn8u/0PeIspRix3Vq
oEQAniwclQ9hFKNEvlaZBaNshZ3nd5/9
=ZKk3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
