[3788] in WWW Security List Archive
Re: COMPARISON: Stronghold vs. ApacheSSL
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Brennen)
Thu Dec 12 16:20:25 1996
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 13:04:35 -0600 (CST)
From: Michael Brennen <mbrennen@fni.com>
To: Ben Laurie <ben@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
cc: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <9612121123.aa26365@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
Errors-To: owner-www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
On Thu, 12 Dec 1996, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Stronghold is derived from Apache-SSL. The only notable differences I'm
> aware of are that Apache-SSL is free, and Stronghold isn't. Apache-SSL
> doesn't come precompiled, and Stronghold does.
For which fee I can legally use Stronghold commercially use in the US.
Unless things have changed or my understanding is way off, I cannot do
that with Apache-SSL.
This too is a notable difference.
-- Michael
