[1694] in WWW Security List Archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Thanks for the downloading help!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Albert T Crowley)
Thu Mar 21 16:00:56 1996

Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 11:56:08 -0500
From: crowley@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (Albert T Crowley)
To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.90.960321002452.20179C-100000@jobe.shell.portal.com> (dwm@shell.portal.com)
Errors-To: owner-www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu


   However, neither of these copyright statements stands alone. Calling 
   individual pages copyrighted implictly is not likely to stand the court
   tests anymore than copyright law protects a letter sent to me w/o
   any form of copyright marking.

A friend of mine is a copyright lawyer (intellectual property), and she
says that all web pages are implicitly copyrighted under current
copyright law.

Furthermore, making a copy of a page, EVEN IN RAM!, is considered a
copyright violation under the same law.

Making the page available by http does not implicitly wave the
copyright....we all are just breaking the law every time we look at a
web site.

Isn't the legal system great!  (I am not making this up, I swear it
is true as far as I know.)

-Al

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post