[98328] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Certification Test Woes

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Tue Apr 1 16:01:11 2014

Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 22:00:54 +0200
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
To: "tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org"
 <tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMBCAn_wU6Zqr+_AwX-WbuOtevTPM2Dg4nw9cBhufHjc=pq-xg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org


Am 01.04.2014 18:39, schrieb Lawrence M. Schoen:
> Following up on d'Armond's more rational argument let me just add that
> in the long history of tests administered on this or any other world, I
> believe there has always been at least one student heard to complain
> that it wasn't "fair."

Following what Lawrence says, I'd like to also make clear that I do not 
see any real problems with the KLCP, nor do I see the need of changing 
anything.
I was just answering the question what some people had problems with.

Also being on to have proctored and graded many tests over the past 
years, I di not notice anyone really complaining it was not fair. They 
usually say they were just not enough prepared for the kind of questions.

I did see others pass the test in less than thirty minutes, so it's 
possible to pass it.

Generally spoken, I'd say leave the KLCP as it is, but create a level 
zero test for true newbies so they can get a feel of the language.

-- 
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher


_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post