[94531] in tlhIngan-Hol
[Tlhingan-hol] -Ha' on adverbs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Qov)
Thu Aug 30 11:00:20 2012
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:59:53 -0600
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Qov <robyn@flyingstart.ca>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
Asked if jaSHa' and pe'vIlHa' were okay, Marc said, "Why wouldn't
they be?" implying that -Ha' on adverbs is generally accepted, if the
meaning is obvious. vajHa' has already been canonically rejected, but
given the general confusion regarding what chaqHa' and rutHa' could
mean, they were not accepted.
SaH ghunchu'wI', 'angghal, QeS je. lutchaj vIja' neH.
- Qov
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
