[94182] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nup bop bom: 'ay' cha'vatlh loSmaH loS:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh)
Sun Jul 29 01:24:55 2012
From: Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:24:40 +1000
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120725232915.0416c6f0@flyingstart.ca>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
ghItlhpu' Qov, jatlh:
> QoD qImyal Duj 'ach baHrupDI' Qa'bar nuH, reH Qa'bar
> puSDaq qImyal Duj tu'lu'[355].
I really like this phrasing.
> nItlhDu'DajDaq Dujvetlh ngaDmoHtaH Hota'ro'. qImyal
> Duj luHotlhtaH.
'Iv 'oS {lu-}? nungbogh mu'tlheghmo' tlhoS Hota'ro' nItlhDu'
vIQub, 'ach lughbe'ba' 'e' vItlhoj.
> chalDaq DIngtaHvIS meQqu'taHbogh qul moQ,
I could get Sach or tInchoH, but can a qul moQ really DIng?
> yaychajmo' jachqu' vagh ghogh. tamtaH Hota'ro'. Qugh
> luvemmoH 'ach loptaH neH 'e' leghDI' Qongqa' 'e' nID.
luvemmoH seems to assume that the focus has changed, but then
the focus shifts back to Hota'ro'. Can I suggest that you use
an explicit subject for luvemmoH to clear that up?
> qughwI' SaqmoH Hota'ro'.
If qughwI' is "cruiser", we do have qughDuj for that.
> qaStaHvIS wejmaH DIS mumaghtaH 'e' vIlajchu'pu'pa'
{'e'} tlha'mo' wot {laj}, {-pu'} yIteq.
> QIt jatlh qaH'eng, =ABveSDaq qaSlI' ... QuDHom.=BB
{QuDHom} qechmo' jIHaghqu'.
> Duj naQvaD Mahoun parmaq Dotlh chu' maq 'e' Sov Mahoun.
qatlh qabpaq DotlhDaj neH choHbe'pu'? :P
QeS 'utlh
=
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
