[93748] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Time and Type 7 verb suffixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Sat Jun 16 21:16:51 2012
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmMkBWn1_vagutWcX-k=1fvC3QXfa_=XTUkTQPPbfr=D8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:16:14 -0400
To: Klingon language email discussion forum <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
On Jun 16, 2012, at 12:10 PM, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
> What would be a counterexample to his (and my) interpretation of the sentence from TKD p.40 about the meaning of a verb when a Type 7 suffix is absent is an instance from canon of a verb expressing a perfective or continuous aspect but which does not have the corresponding suffix. And I don't think there's any such example from canon.
I can think of one immediately: {nughoS jagh} from the Conversational
Klingon battle vignette.
(The abundant paq'batlh examples are apparently tainted by having been
read before publication by a group that did not include SuStel, so I
won't detail them here.)
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
