[92742] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] To-Be-Constructions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Trimboli)
Tue Apr 3 11:25:28 2012
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:25:08 -0400
From: David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name>
To: tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmOD7qCEx2eHZQiLwwXdJmY3KtiDTnXVLuqZL_36bHZFHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
On 4/3/2012 10:59 AM, De'vID jonpIn wrote:
>
> De'vID:
> >> This is unambiguously the canonical grammar
>
> SuStel:
> > mu'vetlh lo'taHchugh Hoch, vay' vIHoHbej jay'...
>
> mu'vam vIlo'be'choH 'e' vInID!
jIbeppu'DI' loQ jIqIDpu' neH. loQ.
Your lack of time context in that sentence confuses me. Do you mean you
have previously tried to stop using the word, or that you plan to stop
using it in the future? Or both?
> toH. lugh pabvam, qar'a'?
lughba'. not vIHon.
--
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
