[91842] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] qIHpu'ghach wa'DIch - 'ay' wa'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID jonpIn)
Wed Jan 25 17:22:57 2012
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:22:36 +0100
From: "De'vID jonpIn" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan-Hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
--===============9106102744675169452==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305e26ad6a0d7d04b761b3d9
--20cf305e26ad6a0d7d04b761b3d9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
QeS 'utlh:
> PICARD: Borg Locutus jIH. QaplaHbe' qaDtaHghach.
loghaD:
> For "Resistance is futile", I might suggest something like
SuHub'eghlaHbe', lo'laHbe' Hub or lo'laHbe' Hub'eghghach.
Is there some reason everyone's avoiding the obvious {'om}?
{Su'omlaHbe'}
{che'omlaHbe'}
{QaplaHbe' 'omtaHghach}
{Su'omchugh SuQapQo'}
{wI'omlu'chugh lujlu'bej}
etc.
--
De'vID
--20cf305e26ad6a0d7d04b761b3d9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
<p>QeS 'utlh:<br>
> PICARD: Borg Locutus jIH. QaplaHbe' qaDtaHghach.</p>
<p>loghaD:<br>
> For "Resistance is futile", I might suggest something like SuHub'eghlaHbe', lo'laHbe' Hub or lo'laHbe' Hub'eghghach.</p>
<p>Is there some reason everyone's avoiding the obvious {'om}?</p>
<p>{Su'omlaHbe'}<br>
{che'omlaHbe'}<br>
{QaplaHbe' 'omtaHghach}<br>
{Su'omchugh SuQapQo'}<br>
{wI'omlu'chugh lujlu'bej}</p>
<p>etc.</p>
<p>--<br>
De'vID</p>
--20cf305e26ad6a0d7d04b761b3d9--
--===============9106102744675169452==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============9106102744675169452==--