[91800] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh wejmaH wej:

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID jonpIn)
Sun Jan 22 18:00:37 2012

Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:21 +0100
From: "De'vID jonpIn" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
To: KLI <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org

--===============4405552465027829874==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3040eac6de55ad04b725e01d

--20cf3040eac6de55ad04b725e01d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

QeS 'utlh:
> > > Makes sense. If that's the case, then in order to say that you cover
> > > X with Y, you'd have to say {X velmeH Y vIlo'} or {Y-vaD X vIvelmoH};

De'vID:
> > > I think you mean {X-vaD Y vIvelmoH}?

QeS 'utlh:
> > Nope. We only have a single clear example of a causative of a divalent
> > verb, but it shows that it's the *subject* of the non-causative form
> > that gets demoted to the {-vaD} position in the causative, so:
> >
> > ghaHvaD quHDaj qawmoH
> > It reminds him of his heritage. (S20)

De'vID:
> *mind blown*

Maybe I can translate this line like so:

It is imperative that we act now to support the Gorkon initiative, lest
more conservative elements persuade his Empire that it is better to attempt
a military solution and die fighting.

ghorqon jInmol'a' wIlajnIS 'ej wInumnIS. DaH mavangbe'chugh, wo'DajvaD
qechvam luHarmoH choHqangbe'wI'pu': SuvtaHvIS Hegh qaq law' yIn qaq puS.

I wonder if {pon} works the same way as {HarmoH} (i.e., {vay'vaD qech pon})?

--
De'vID

--20cf3040eac6de55ad04b725e01d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<p><br>
QeS &#39;utlh:<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; Makes sense. If that&#39;s the case, then in order to say that you cover<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; X with Y, you&#39;d have to say {X velmeH Y vIlo&#39;} or {Y-vaD X vIvelmoH};</p>
<p>De&#39;vID:<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; I think you mean {X-vaD Y vIvelmoH}?</p>
<p>QeS &#39;utlh:<br>
&gt; &gt; Nope. We only have a single clear example of a causative of a divalent<br>
&gt; &gt; verb, but it shows that it&#39;s the *subject* of the non-causative form<br>
&gt; &gt; that gets demoted to the {-vaD} position in the causative, so:<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; ghaHvaD quHDaj qawmoH<br>
&gt; &gt; It reminds him of his heritage. (S20)</p>
<p>De&#39;vID:<br>
&gt; *mind blown*</p>
<p>Maybe I can translate this line like so:</p>
<p>It is imperative that we act now to support the Gorkon initiative, lest more conservative elements persuade his Empire that it is better to attempt a military solution and die fighting.</p>
<p>ghorqon jInmol&#39;a&#39; wIlajnIS &#39;ej wInumnIS. DaH mavangbe&#39;chugh, wo&#39;DajvaD qechvam luHarmoH choHqangbe&#39;wI&#39;pu&#39;: SuvtaHvIS Hegh qaq law&#39; yIn qaq puS. </p>
<p>I wonder if {pon} works the same way as {HarmoH} (i.e., {vay&#39;vaD qech pon})?</p>
<p>--<br>
De&#39;vID </p>

--20cf3040eac6de55ad04b725e01d--


--===============4405552465027829874==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

--===============4405552465027829874==--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post