[91676] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] qo''e' tu'bogh pagh - 'ay' wej
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven Litaer)
Thu Jan 12 16:24:05 2012
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:23:53 +0100
From: Lieven Litaer <lieven.litaer@web.de>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmNsTPT2PMXek+ydzeaRbUD9Z0XpHn=4VYHxJkzxZiGfMg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
That's funny, I did not follow this thread, nor did I read the subject
line - but when I read the lines, I recognised immediately which movie
this was :-)
One question:
> KIRK: nuqDaq ghaH *Spock*'e'?
We do know that in "to be at a place" constructions, the pronoun usually
takes the suffix {-taH}. This was done correctly in the first sentence,
but missing in this question. Is this an eception here?
Lieven.
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
