[91526] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] On the word {tlho'} and its kin

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Trimboli)
Tue Jan 3 10:51:52 2012

Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:51:32 -0500
From: David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name>
To: tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
In-Reply-To: <1325605304.91245.YahooMailClassic@web82601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org

On 1/3/2012 10:41 AM, Terrence Donnelly wrote:
>
> Looking at this discussion of {tlho'} and thinking about the
> discussion a while back about the meaning of verbs unmarked vs marked
> with {-ta'/-pu'} and {-taH}, it occurs to me that if we work hard
> enough, we could probably make this language totally unusable!

Different from English, you mean? Why, yes, it is.

-- 
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post