[91525] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] On the word {tlho'} and its kin
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Terrence Donnelly)
Tue Jan 3 10:42:06 2012
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 07:41:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Terrence Donnelly <terrence.donnelly@sbcglobal.net>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120102085114.045556f0@flyingstart.ca>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
Looking at this discussion of {tlho'} and thinking about the discussion a while back about the meaning of verbs unmarked vs marked with {-ta'/-pu'} and {-taH}, it occurs to me that if we work hard enough, we could probably make this language totally unusable!
-- ter'eS
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
