[90701] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' chorghmaH wej: <'e' tul pagh
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Tue Nov 15 15:47:22 2011
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20111113225846.04ea12f8@flyingstart.ca>
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:46:42 -0500
To: tlhIngan Hol email discussion forum <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Qov <robyn@flyingstart.ca> wrote:
> tlhuHmeH vumqu' ro SomrawDu'.
Do'Ha'. Qapbe'chugh 'Iw, pe'vIl tlhuHlaH vay' 'ach QaHbe'taH. leSchugh
SIQwI' ghaytan 'arghbe' 'e' HarQo'.
> volchaHDajDaq qat. meH lu'el. "mIch wejvaD yIntagh yImobmoH. mIch wa'vaD
> mIch cha'vaD je yInSIp yIghurmoH. cha'maH Hut vatlhvI' yIwIv." jatlh HoD.
('ach mobDI' mIch wej yIntagh, chay' latlh mIch SIghlaH muD ngeb
SeHmeH pat? mIchvamDaq 'oH, qar'a'? Qatlhba' yIbmey.)
> ghutar 'Iw Hotlh HoD 'ej Hotlh'egh je.
{Hotlh'egh je} is an interesting stretch of grammar. I think it works
-- there's nothing else it could mean in context except "he scanned
[himself too]" -- but I think there's a potential conflict between
using {-'egh} and applying an adverbial {je} to only the subject or
the object of the verb.
> jatlh HoD, "vISovbe'. Hota'ro', naw'meH lojmItvetlh yIpoSmoH."
qatlh DeghwI' ghongtaH'a' HoD? lojmIt 'emDaq SaHchugh tar, junnISba'
roptaHwI'. nuqDaq chach yInSIp pollu'? jIlaDtaHvIS jIbItqu'. SIbI'
logh mIv tuQ beq vIneH.
> ...lojmIt ngep ghutar...
cha'logh <ngep> lo'pu' lut. cha'logh mu'ghom vIlo'. wa'logh
vIlo'nISDI' jIqun'eghbe'. cha'logh vIlo'nISmo' jItuH. jItuHmo' ghaytan
reH mu' vIqaw.
> "HoD!" jatlh ghutar. "vIta'laH. leS 'e' yIchaw'."
> jatlh HoD, "meH yISeH. Duj toy'."
pay' vIttlhegh naQ vItlhoj. DaH HoD vIyaj.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
