[89628] in tlhIngan-Hol
RE: New words
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Felix Malmenbeck)
Mon Sep 12 14:30:00 2011
From: Felix Malmenbeck <felixm@kth.se>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:20:40 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmN7CEGg=U3ajhFuEvx3yRaHeubrGKaAx7QvZ5XjJ8CBQw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
It's a word that was used as a speculative word and then passed into common use, but to the best of my knowledge it's never become canonized.
An e-mail from Voragh sent in 2004 sheds some light on the issue: http://www.kli.org/tlhIngan-Hol/2004/July/msg00220.html
//loghaD
________________________________________
From: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org [tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org] on behalf of De'vID ( ) [de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 20:04
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Subject: Re: New words
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Terrence Donnelly <
terrence.donnelly@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> --- On Thu, 12/23/10, Felix Malmenbeck <felixm@kth.se> wrote:
>
> >
> > If you only want to see new words, that's a bit more
> > difficult. http://teresh.tdonnelly.org/klinewest.html appears to
> > have most of them.
> >
>
> I haven't updated this in several years (I fell behind in following the
> release of new vocabulary, and no longer feel competent to make the
> additions), so there are still newer words than those.
>
> -- ter'eS
>
I'm trying to clean up my canon word list.
Is <jIn> "v. brew" (found in the linked page above) a word? The rest of
this thread seems to indicate that it isn't, and that it's a hypothesised *
noun*. Or is it a hypothesised word that got canonised (but as a different
part of speech?!)?
--
De'vID ( )
