[89625] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: 'oghwI' lut
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robyn Stewart)
Mon Sep 12 13:22:38 2011
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:11:04 -0700
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Robyn Stewart <robyn@flyingstart.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CABDLMbVJv2yixPMspB4dhP8SUFy9Nq3yjEBFADmwRHAr9PytGA@mail.g
mail.com>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
At 09:36 12/09/2011, you wrote:
>2011/9/12 Robyn Stewart <robyn@flyingstart.ca>
> > ><<HuS, pa'wIjDaq jIjaH! HItlhej!>> ra' Qel.
> >
> > In a complex set of rules that I myself get wrong, pa'Daq jIjaH means
> > I am already inside the room and the motion takes place inside it.
> > pa'wIj vIjaH is the meaning you want.
> >
> >
>Actually we have a canon phrase that states the opposite:
>{pa'Daq yIjaH!} means "Go to the room!", TKD, p. 27
>I guess, this sentence is ambiguous and can *also* mean "Go inside the
>room!", but it's probably context-sensitive.
>
>Then again, we have another sentence:
>{bIghHa' yIjaH!}, meaning "Go to jail!", from the Monopoly game.
>
>So it seems {jaH} may or may not use the {-Daq} suffix, perhaps it's added
>for clarification.
Yes, the HolQeD 7:4 interview makes it clear that that -Daq is
unnecessary but not wrong.
