[89498] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'maH jav
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh)
Thu Sep 8 05:40:58 2011
From: Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:29:34 +1000
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110904145411.0455c908@flyingstart.ca>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
ghItlhpu' Qov, jatlh:
> yuQDaq pawpa' Duj, ngIq[8] yaSvaD Qu' De' Qum HoD.
(..poD)
> [8] I officially love this word.
Isn't it awesome? Kind of disturbing how brilliant it is considering we
can't even quite define it in English. I've already used it in chIjwI'
tIQ bom five times.
> reH Qu' nungbogh vanglI'ghach'e' tIv HoD.
Another place where -ghach is perfect, especially when coupled with the
-lI'.
> quSDajDaq ba'choH. "rI'Se' yIpoSmoH" jatlh.
Hrm. This sounds a little like an English calque. I'm not saying it's
necessarily wrong, but do you prefer poSmoH to chu'?
> 'eSSIm qab cha'choHDI' HaSta,
Would 'ang be better here? (Funny, I seem hell-bent on lexicon today.)
> rI'mo' nov mISba' tlhIngan. jup mu' nop Mahoun. tlhIngan tIgh Sov.
> tlhIngan lunuQ malja' bopbe'bogh mu'mey'e'.
*lu*bopbe'bogh, qar'a'?
> "lI'wI'vaD loQ pegh jabbI'IDvam. ruQ vIHIj 'e' maS," jatlh Mahoun.
wot 'oH {ruQ} 'e' vIHar. "ruQ VIHIj" bIjatlhDI', qech vIyajchu', 'ach
mu'mey vIpojlaHbe' neH.
vItIvtaH! yuQDaq qaS nuq? ja'chuqDI' 'eSSIm Mahoun je, nuq luqel? tugh
'e' vItu'.
QeS 'utlh
