[89223] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: chIjwI' qanqu' bom: 'ay' wa'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Mon Aug 29 15:12:43 2011
In-Reply-To: <BAY166-W55C166FE568DEEC5C941DFAA150@phx.gbl>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:06:22 -0400
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
>'ej bIQDaq chuch wIjuS, wISuch, HuD woch rurbogh chuch SuD.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh
<qeslagh@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The idea is they're not deliberately visiting it, but because the ice
> is floating past them, they are anyway. Do you think I'm stretching
> the sense of {Such} too far?
I don't think {Such} works for this. Instead of {...chuch wIjuS,
wISuch}, consider {...wIghoS, wIjuS}.
As for the "one of three" issue, I really dislike the suggestion of
using {-vo'}. {wej nuvpu' wa'} "one of three people" seems fine to me
(except for the potential confusion of {wej}, which is why I used the
explicit plural).
I greatly admire the skill with which you have maintained rhyme and
meter. It takes a special mindset to do it well.
-- ghunchu'wI'