[89185] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: nuq bop bom: 'ay' loS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robyn Stewart)
Thu Aug 25 11:54:35 2011
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:42:11 -0700
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Robyn Stewart <robyn@flyingstart.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20C63BFE-D9C2-4BF5-AB4F-59995CAA4BC5@gmail.com>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
At 07:28 25/08/2011, you wrote:
>I would think it would be more direct to talk about his face showing
>pain rather than all this talk about pain at his face's location.
>
>'oy' 'ang qablIj 'e' lutu'chugh vaj Duj Dotlh qelba'taH net Sov.
bIlugh. qaq.
'oy' 'angchugh qabDaj vaj Duj Dotlh qelba' 'e' luHar yaSpu'.
>This editorial suggestion is a bit pushier than the original.
>
>So?
yIyuvtaH. reH DujlIj vItlho'.
>pItlh.
>lojmIt tI'wI' nuv
>
>
>
>On Aug 25, 2011, at 7:53 AM, Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh wrote:
>
> > pov lutvam; vIlaD 'e' vItIv. tagha' qelqu'meH poH vItu'pu'.
> >
> > ghItlhpu' Qov, jatlh:
> >> Sagh yaS wa'DIch 'ej ngoDmey neH jatlh. "jorpu' nuH HoS 'och. chavpu'
> >> nIH HanDogh.
> >
> > {chav} "achieve" DaHechqu''a'?
> >
> >> jatlhtaHvIS yaS, Hu'meH vajar poS ghop lo' 'ej quchDajDaq ba'choH.
> >
> > {quch} "to kidnap"? {quS} 'oHnISlaw'.
> >
> >> qabDajDaq 'oy' luleghchugh chaq Duj Dotlhmo' 'oH 'e' luHar yaSpu'.
> >
> > I'm not sure I like {'oH} here without an explicit location to go with
> > it. Assuming I'm reading this right ("if the officers saw pain on his
> > face, they believed it was due to the ship's status"), {Duj Dotlhmo'
> > 'oH} seems incomplete to me stylistically; I would say {Duj Dotlhmo'
> > pa' 'oHtaH}, with {pa'} referring back to {qabDajDaq}. But that's me.
> >
> >> poSDaq tlhe'taHvIS loQ Qom 'ach Qom DeghwI' ghop 'e' leghlaH vajar.
> >
> > QaQ lo'vam! {Qom}meyvam vIparHa'.
> >
> >> DIngba' Duj'e' 'a Do' Qapchu'mo' tlham ngab, yoylaw' Hovmey.
> >
> > {tlham ngeb} "artificial gravity"?
> >
> > Dajqu' - tugh qaSbogh vajar beqDaj je wanI' vISov vIneH!
> >
> > QeS 'utlh
> >
> >
