[88965] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Context
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Terrence Donnelly)
Fri Jul 22 11:18:46 2011
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Terrence Donnelly <terrence.donnelly@sbcglobal.net>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In-Reply-To: <79883A13-1614-47B2-8B2C-E5CAC08FED16@gmail.com>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
"Context" seems like a jargon term; I don't think I've ever seen it used outside of linguistics or literacy teaching. Probably neither of which Maltz is very familiar with.
-- ter'eS
--- On Fri, 7/22/11, lojmIt tI'wI'nuv <lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: lojmIt tI'wI'nuv <lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com>
> Subject: Context
> To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
> Date: Friday, July 22, 2011, 6:22 AM
> Given how often Okrand has explained
> that aspects of the language requires context to comprehend
> detail, it is ironic that he has not given us a word for
> "context".
>
> lojmit tI'wI'nuv
>
> Sent from my iPod
>
>
>
