[88649] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: mu'tlheghvam yIlughmoH
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ruben Molina)
Sat Jan 8 10:34:27 2011
In-Reply-To: <B82F9592-80E2-4741-8363-4A546DE6A715@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 10:27:45 -0500
From: Ruben Molina <rmolina@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:50 AM, lojmIt tI'wI'nuv
<lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your use of {-lI'} with {Sov} is quite unusual and probably ill chosen. This suffix implies that the action is currently continuous toward a foreseeable goal, then the action will end. It would better if used with {ghoj}. You learn until you know. Knowing is the goal of the process, not the process itself. Learning is the process.
bIlugh.
> The word {'ach} is a conjunction, so this is one sentence and there is no reason to use the pronoun {'e'}.
bIlugh.
> You continue to misunderstand the pronoun {'e'}. It can never represent {bomvam 'o'megh}. That's not a sentence. You can't pick a phrase out of a sentence and use {'e'} to represent it. {'e'} always represents the whole sentence.
bilugh :(
jInIDHa'.
{bomvam 'o'megh' vIghojvlI' 'ach wej 'e' vISovbej} yIqel.
(qarbe' mu'tlheghwIj 'e' vISov)
{bomvam 'o'megh'} 'oS {'e'} 'e' DaHarHa'chugh
vaj qar mu'tlheghlIj 'e' DaHarHa'
bIlughbe',
{bomvam 'o'megh' vIghojlI'} 'oSbej {'e'}.
{'ach} DaghItlhmo' {'e'} DaghItlhnISbe' je.
{bomvam 'o'megh' vIghojvlI' 'ach wej bomvam 'o'megh' vISovbej} 'oS
{bomvam 'o'megh' vIghojvlI' 'ach wej vISovbej}
qar'a'
qatlho'
ruben
